Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

e2e: consider adding a second kubo node and run the test offline #1131

Open
galargh opened this issue Jan 17, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

e2e: consider adding a second kubo node and run the test offline #1131

galargh opened this issue Jan 17, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
effort/days Estimated to take multiple days, but less than a week exp/beginner Can be confidently tackled by newcomers kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature kind/maintenance Work required to avoid breaking changes or harm to project's status quo kind/test Testing work P3 Low: Not priority right now status/ready Ready to be worked topic/ci Continuous integration

Comments

@galargh
Copy link
Contributor

galargh commented Jan 17, 2023

If we had 2 Kubo nodes running in the E2E setup, we would be able to run the tests offline, because this would guarantee each Kubo node has peers to discover.

See #1121 (comment)
@galargh galargh added the need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization label Jan 17, 2023
@galargh galargh mentioned this issue Jan 17, 2023
Merged
9 tasks
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Needs Grooming in IPFS-GUI (PL EngRes) Jan 17, 2023
@SgtPooki SgtPooki added kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature kind/maintenance Work required to avoid breaking changes or harm to project's status quo P3 Low: Not priority right now status/ready Ready to be worked kind/test Testing work exp/beginner Can be confidently tackled by newcomers effort/days Estimated to take multiple days, but less than a week topic/ci Continuous integration and removed need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization labels Feb 4, 2023
@SgtPooki SgtPooki moved this from Needs Grooming to Planned / Backlog in IPFS-GUI (PL EngRes) Feb 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
effort/days Estimated to take multiple days, but less than a week exp/beginner Can be confidently tackled by newcomers kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature kind/maintenance Work required to avoid breaking changes or harm to project's status quo kind/test Testing work P3 Low: Not priority right now status/ready Ready to be worked topic/ci Continuous integration
Projects
No open projects
IPFS-GUI (PL EngRes)
Status: Planned / Backlog
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@SgtPooki @galargh