Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better handling of already running ipfs daemon #19

Closed
jbenet opened this issue Jul 9, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

Better handling of already running ipfs daemon #19

jbenet opened this issue Jul 9, 2015 · 5 comments
Labels
kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws)

Comments

@jbenet
Copy link
Member

jbenet commented Jul 9, 2015

@jbenet
Copy link
Member Author

jbenet commented Jul 9, 2015

i think it was when i started this node while a background daemon was running?

@daviddias daviddias added the kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws) label Aug 11, 2015
@caioalonso
Copy link

+1
Screenshot
These are the steps that I did:

  1. $ ipfs daemon
  2. $ npm start
  3. Turn IPFS Node on
  4. Ctrl-C the daemon

@jbenet
Copy link
Member Author

jbenet commented Oct 2, 2015

this thing runs its own daemon. you dont need to run it yourself. it's port clashing

also, we need a waaaay better error for that. ugh

@caioalonso
Copy link

@jbenet yes, a simple port conflict shouldn't crash it.

@dignifiedquire dignifiedquire changed the title bug: got this screen Better handling of already running ipfs daemon Oct 19, 2015
@hacdias
Copy link
Member

hacdias commented Dec 6, 2017

Already a bit better than what it was in 2015. Although, there is still a lot of room to improvement. Will continue this on #527.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants