Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discussion: Metrics normalization #128

Closed
SgtPooki opened this issue Dec 2, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Discussion: Metrics normalization #128

SgtPooki opened this issue Dec 2, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
kind/discussion Topical discussion; usually not changes to codebase

Comments

@SgtPooki
Copy link
Member

SgtPooki commented Dec 2, 2022

ipfs-companion metrics from firefox does not support monthly active users. We need a way to normalize them.

This issue should cover any other projects that don't use the same metrics collection system as the rest of our projects (currently using countly).

Some questions and other considerations:

  1. Do we want to add countly metrics collection to ipfs-companion?
  2. Is adding additional metrics (countly) collection in ipfs-companion going to work?

Proposed answers:

  1. Yes, this would ensure all our projects have normalized metrics and aren't dependent upon different tools
  2. needs investigation
@SgtPooki SgtPooki added the kind/discussion Topical discussion; usually not changes to codebase label Dec 2, 2022
@BigLep
Copy link

BigLep commented Dec 2, 2022

I think it's useful to be able to own our metrics so we can more confidently reason them, and so we have to put less trust in other groups.

That said, if this becomes a major undertaking, I am fine not prioritizing it right now.

For example, while yes it would be nice if Firefox Companion gave different stats than daily active users, Firefox companion usage is also the smaller piece of the pie and is less critical to me.

@SgtPooki
Copy link
Member Author

SgtPooki commented Dec 14, 2022

closing this. See #125, #105, and ipfs/ipfs-companion#1115

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/discussion Topical discussion; usually not changes to codebase
Projects
No open projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants