You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@Stebalien thinks we should store pinning information in a real database.
This could work, but one concern not discussed is the size. I believe this is one of the original reasons we did not originally do something similar before.
One of the reasons for my suggestion to using inode-like data structures is avoid a size increase for storing simple information such as reference counts, as if it part of the inode (#5528) it is just another 32 (or maybe 64) bits. If we store it separately there is the cost of the storing the key which can be significant. Especially for small blocks.
@Stebalien thinks we should store pinning information in a real database.
This could work, but one concern not discussed is the size. I believe this is one of the original reasons we did not originally do something similar before.
Depends on #5591
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: