You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As discussed here, I'm splitting out a separate issue for allowing backticks to be used inside embedded Javascript blocks.
This is a straight-up bug fix for an issue that has been around since 2011, but has become more important since the introduction of ES6 template literals.
ES6 template literals cannot be used in an embedded Javascript block, since the new syntax uses backticks. Backticks are already used by Coffeescript to define the start and end of the JS block. This example blows up:
`3 + 2 = ${3 + 2}`
The proposed fix is for Coffeescript to allow embedded Javascript blocks to be delineated with 3-backticks markdown-style, and not escape backticks in the Javascript block. E.g.:
From @greghuc on 2016-09-20 18:16
As discussed here, I'm splitting out a separate issue for allowing backticks to be used inside embedded Javascript blocks.
This is a straight-up bug fix for an issue that has been around since 2011, but has become more important since the introduction of ES6 template literals.
ES6 template literals cannot be used in an embedded Javascript block, since the new syntax uses backticks. Backticks are already used by Coffeescript to define the start and end of the JS block. This example blows up:
The proposed fix is for Coffeescript to allow embedded Javascript blocks to be delineated with 3-backticks markdown-style, and not escape backticks in the Javascript block. E.g.:
Reasoning:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: