We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I'll try to get a nicer repro in the morning but this shows the issue for now.
Example:
class basic_string { basic_string() noexcept(noexcept(Allocator())) : basic_string(Allocator()) {} explicit basic_string(const Allocator &alloc) noexcept : __string({._s = {{}, _SSO_Cap}}, alloc){}; // see LWG 3076 for defect report, disabling comes from libc++ template < class = std::enable_if_t<std::__is_allocator<Allocator>::value, nullptr_t>> basic_string(size_type count, CharT ch, const Allocator &alloc = Allocator()) : __string({}, alloc) { CharT *buf = _New_allocate(count); for(size_t s = 0; s < count; s++) { traits_type::assign(buf[s], ch); } traits_type::assign(buf[count], CharT()); } };
Image:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Caused by the noexcept(noexcept()) on line 2.
noexcept(noexcept())
Sorry, something went wrong.
alright I'll get this merged in today
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
I'll try to get a nicer repro in the morning but this shows the issue for now.
Example:
Image:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: