You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 26, 2023. It is now read-only.
The ambiguity arrises because its not clear if the checkbox label refers to the current state or the state the client will become if you uncheck the checkbox. I'm not sure of the best/right solution but a minimal step to effectively invert the checkbox label and reflect the current state, something like:
Ideally the label is constant and the checkbox is unchecked if the client is ineligible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Maybe it makes sense to remove the check boxes for the first 2 items, as they are not a state, but an event. They do result in a state, being the eligibility and in a procedure (removing either all or non-system allocs).
This UI element is a bit confusing:
The ambiguity arrises because its not clear if the checkbox label refers to the current state or the state the client will become if you uncheck the checkbox. I'm not sure of the best/right solution but a minimal step to effectively invert the checkbox label and reflect the current state, something like:
Ideally the label is constant and the checkbox is unchecked if the client is ineligible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: