You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When I try this, the generated class doesn't have the second > on the end of the type, so renders a compile error (in the attribute, the getter and the setter).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The parsing is pretty dump here right now, it's simply splitting the generic type arguments by commas and doesn't support nested generic types. Should be reasonably simple to make this solution recursive however I'm concerned about how many more edge cases there might be in trying to replicate the full compatible Java syntax.
Using 0.4.2, I am trying out generics. I have declared as follows:
When I try this, the generated class doesn't have the second > on the end of the type, so renders a compile error (in the attribute, the getter and the setter).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: