subsystem | maintainers |
---|---|
benchmark/* |
@nodejs/benchmarking, @mscdex |
bootstrap_node.js |
@fishrock123 |
lib/assert |
@nodejs/testing |
lib/buffer |
@nodejs/buffer |
lib/child_process |
@bnoordhuis, @cjihrig |
lib/cluster |
@bnoordhuis, @cjihrig, @mcollina |
lib/{crypto,tls,https} |
@nodejs/crypto |
lib/dgram |
@cjihrig, @mcollina |
lib/domains |
@misterdjules |
lib/fs , `src/{fs |
file}` |
lib/internal/url , src/node_url |
@nodejs/url |
lib/{_}http{*} |
@nodejs/http |
lib/net |
@bnoordhuis, @indutny, @nodejs/streams |
`lib/{_}stream{s | *}` |
lib/repl |
@addaleax, @fishrock123 |
lib/timers |
@fishrock123, @misterdjules |
lib/util |
@bnoordhuis, @cjihrig, @evanlucas |
lib/zlib |
@addaleax, @bnoordhuis, @indutny |
src/async-wrap.* |
@trevnorris |
src/node_crypto.* |
@nodejs/crypto |
test/* |
@nodejs/testing |
tools/eslint , .eslintrc |
@not-an-aardvark, @silverwind, @trott |
async_hooks | @nodejs/diagnostics |
upgrading V8 | @nodejs/v8, @nodejs/post-mortem |
upgrading npm | @fishrock123, @MylesBorins |
upgrading c-ares | @jbergstroem |
upgrading http-parser | @jbergstroem, @nodejs/http |
upgrading libuv | @saghul |
python code | @nodejs/python |
platform specific | @nodejs/platform-{aix,arm,freebsd,macos,ppc,smartos,s390,windows} |
When things need extra attention, are controversial, or semver-major
: @nodejs/ctc
If you cannot find who to cc for a file, git shortlog -n -s <file>
may help.
We generally sort issues by a concept of "subsystem" so that we know what part(s) of the codebase it touches.
Subsystems generally are:
lib/*.js
doc
,build
,tools
,test
,deps
,lib / src
(special), and there may be others.meta
for anything non-code (process) related
There may be more than one subsystem valid for any particular issue / PR.
Please use these when possible / appropriate
confirmed-bug
- Bugs you have verified existdiscuss
- Things that need larger discussionfeature request
- Any issue that requests a new feature (usually not PRs)good first contribution
- Issues suitable for newcomers to process
--
semver-{minor,major}
- be conservative – that is, if a change has the remote chance of breaking something, go for semver-major
- when adding a semver label, add a comment explaining why you're adding it
- minor vs. patch: roughly: "does it add a new method / does it add a new section to the docs"
- major vs. everything else: run last versions tests against this version, if they pass, probably minor or patch
- A breaking change helper (full source):
git checkout $(git show -s --pretty='%T' $(git show-ref -d $(git describe --abbrev=0) | tail -n1 | awk '{print $1}')) -- test; make -j4 test
- Operating system labels
macos
,windows
,smartos
,aix
- No linux, linux is the implied default
- Architecture labels
arm
,mips
,s390
,ppc
- No x86{_64}, since that is the implied default
lts-agenda
,lts-watch-v*
- tag things that should be discussed to go into LTS or should go into a specific LTS branch
- (usually only semver-patch things)
- will come more naturally over time
git remote add upstream git://github.com/nodejs/node.git
to update from nodejs/node:
git checkout master
git remote update -p
ORgit fetch --all
(I prefer the former)git merge --ff-only upstream/master
(orREMOTENAME/BRANCH
)
- if
git am
fails – usegit am --abort
- this usually means the PR needs updated
- prefer to make the originating user update the code, since they have it fresh in mind
- first, reattempt with
git am -3
(3-way merge)` - if
-3
still fails, and you need to get it merged:git fetch upstream pull/N/head:pr-N && git checkout pr-N && git rebase master
- commit often, out to your github fork (origin), open a PR
- when making PRs make sure to spend time on the description:
- every moment you spend writing a good description quarters the amount of time it takes to understand your code.
- usually prefer to only squash at the end of your work, depends on the change