-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Docs: Suggest yq for manipulating YAML data #1191
Comments
I would suggest linking to https://github.com/kislyuk/yq instead. |
https://github.com/kislyuk/yq has been added to the answer regarding YAML on the jq FAQ. |
I just released yjq with similar functionality. |
The https://github.com/mikefarah/yq project is currently leading in stars and deployments, but isn't perfect. Still, it should have a mention. It is far superior to the extremely slow and sometimes buggy Python version. Is there an issue to adding a sister |
Since json is just a subset of yaml i'd rather just see jq switch internally and be able to take input in either form and be able to set a flag to output in yaml. It frankly kills me every day when i have to send some yaml through something like yaml2json just so i can manipulate it in jq and then convert it back on the other side. Since all these 'competing tools' that are in the same vein have different syntax and flags and features and I don't want to bloat up build/ci containers with them just to work with a slightly different file format. I'm sure this has been brought up a million times and shot down a million times... but lets make this a million and one. |
why aren't you considering to add YAML support on jq? |
Since #467 is about YAML support of jq and is still open, closing this issue, yq is mentioned in both FAQ and Alternative jq implementations. |
jq is awesome for grokking JSON data! Could the documentation include a link to yq for handling YAML data?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: