Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider having a prefix package name #97

Open
er1c opened this issue Nov 14, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Consider having a prefix package name #97

er1c opened this issue Nov 14, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@er1c
Copy link

er1c commented Nov 14, 2023

e.g. models.generated or some such for every package that's generated

@julianpeeters
Copy link
Owner

Agreed, thanks very much for bringing this up.

The downside is that I can't think of a quick way to integrate it into the current wildcarding system.

@julianpeeters
Copy link
Owner

Possible solutions:

  • ideally, long term as the ecosystem weens off of Scala 2 and settles on scala 3, we can break the old way by changing this predefined Map into a function, so the new name can depend on the old.
  • In the meantime, if you have the bandwidth, you might consider your own fork where you introduce here some mix of your own 'capture group' syntax, or maybe treat the * as a variable

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants