We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I see usage of A_mul_B, A_mul_B!, At_mul_B and At_mul_B! in the source code. Those functions were deprecated in Julia upstream: JuliaLang/julia@d83dca9 JuliaLang/julia#25217
A_mul_B
A_mul_B!
At_mul_B
At_mul_B!
Should JuMP go in the same direction?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, the operator overloading code could use a restructuring. It was updated hastily from Julia 0.6 to 1.0.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
I see usage of
A_mul_B
,A_mul_B!
,At_mul_B
andAt_mul_B!
in the source code.Those functions were deprecated in Julia upstream:
JuliaLang/julia@d83dca9
JuliaLang/julia#25217
Should JuMP go in the same direction?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: