You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I trained pix2pix on only one or two image pairs. My application is to generate watercolor paintings from pencil sketches #416 .
The GAN is supposed to learn a distribution conditioned on the input, not a deterministic mapping from input to output. But my output seems quite deterministic. Is it due to my limited training data? Or due to the limitation of pix2pix?
How can I generate more random and different output samples?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks @junyanz . Found the answer there. BicycleGAN is exactly what I’m looking for.
I want a pix2pix model which can produce different watercolor paintings from the same pencil sketch.
If I have some followup questions, should I ask in the BicycleGAN page?
I trained pix2pix on only one or two image pairs. My application is to generate watercolor paintings from pencil sketches #416 .
The GAN is supposed to learn a distribution conditioned on the input, not a deterministic mapping from input to output. But my output seems quite deterministic. Is it due to my limited training data? Or due to the limitation of pix2pix?
How can I generate more random and different output samples?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: