[WIP] Major revamp of documentation #196
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
vidartf
reviewed
Mar 25, 2020
kevin-bates
reviewed
Apr 16, 2020
|
I'm done with the docs for now. I'd like to merge this as-is. We can iterate and edit in future PRs. |
Closed
hMED22
pushed a commit
to hMED22/jupyter_server
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2023
* Docs WIP * add user docs * start operator docs * [wip] more docs * rearrage some developer docs * more docs * update readme * switch to pydata theme * minor changes to docs * update extending docs * update docs * minor typo
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm in the middle of adding a bunch of documentation to Jupyter Server. Opening now to get the PR in place for merging.
Taking @kevin-bates's suggestion, I've started by separating the documentation into the following roles/personas—1) Users 2) Operators 3) Developers and 4) Contributors
I'm also planning to add a FAQ section to route readers to the appropriate page based on their questions.
This is rebased on #180. I'm hoping we can merge that soon, then this PR can go in.