Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

K8SSAND-996 ⁃ Use an EmptyDir volume for /tmp #210

Closed
jsanda opened this issue Oct 20, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #661
Closed

K8SSAND-996 ⁃ Use an EmptyDir volume for /tmp #210

jsanda opened this issue Oct 20, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #661
Assignees
@burmanm
Labels
done Issues in the state 'done' enhancement New feature or request security

Comments

@jsanda
Copy link
Contributor

jsanda commented Oct 20, 2021 •
edited by sync-by-unito bot
Loading

What is missing?
This is related to #199 and part of the effort to make the root file system read-only. A non-root volume should be used for /tmp. We should use an EmptyDir.

Why do we need it?
Cassandra, management-api, and MCAC all write to /tmp. If we configure the root file system in the cassandra to be read-only several things break as a result of the writes to /tmp

Environment

  • Cass Operator version:

v1.8.0

┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Task by Unito
┆friendlyId: K8SSAND-996
┆priority: Medium
@jsanda jsanda added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 20, 2021
@sync-by-unito sync-by-unito bot changed the title Use a volume for /tmp K8SSAND-996 ⁃ Use a volume for /tmp Oct 20, 2021
@jsanda jsanda changed the title K8SSAND-996 ⁃ Use a volume for /tmp K8SSAND-996 ⁃ Use an EmptyDir volume for /tmp Oct 20, 2021
@jsanda jsanda mentioned this issue Oct 23, 2021
Closed
5 tasks
@bradfordcp
Copy link
Member

@jsanda @adejanovski should this be in a different state since #218 is in review?

@jsanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsanda commented Apr 8, 2022

It's not actually in review. I got the PR to a point where it was ready for review and working based on initial testing. I held off on having anyone review due to changes in priorities.

@jsanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsanda commented Apr 8, 2022

Just realized I didn't answer your question :) yes it should be in a different state.

@bradfordcp
Copy link
Member

Hey team! Please add your planning poker estimate with ZenHub @jsanda @burmanm

@burmanm burmanm mentioned this issue May 29, 2024
Merged
5 tasks
@adejanovski adejanovski added ready-for-review Issues in the state 'ready-for-review' review Issues in the state 'review' and removed ready-for-review Issues in the state 'ready-for-review' labels Jul 16, 2024
@adejanovski adejanovski added done Issues in the state 'done' and removed review Issues in the state 'review' labels Jul 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@burmanm burmanm

Labels
done Issues in the state 'done' enhancement New feature or request security
Projects
No open projects
K8ssandra
Status: Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

ReadOnlyRootFilesystem support burmanm/cass-operator
4 participants
@bradfordcp @jsanda @burmanm @adejanovski