You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now bs-form-group is freestanding. I think it should be contextual under bs-form. It probably escaped notice because bs-form-element inherits from it rather than it being used explicitly.
I ran into this trying to adjust for some BS4 changes to how the form-group class is composed in horizontal layouts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, I also had this in my mind. However I was a bit unsure if there might be use cases where one would want to use bs-form-group without a bs-form, when showing validation state without a real <form>? So I left it untouched so far, but might rethink this...
So the form-group class doesn't automatically pull in row in BS4 in horizontal layout. That means that for it to behave the same, we need to add both row and form-group, but only in horizontal layout. So far, I built it into bs-form.element, but that doesn't apply to all form groups like it should. It would be easier to integrate it nicely as a contextual component, although not required. It took me awhile to realize that elementextendedform-group.
Right now
bs-form-group
is freestanding. I think it should be contextual underbs-form
. It probably escaped notice becausebs-form-element
inherits from it rather than it being used explicitly.I ran into this trying to adjust for some BS4 changes to how the
form-group
class is composed in horizontal layouts.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: