Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrate check-bib-for-predatory #348

Closed
koppor opened this issue Oct 1, 2019 · 7 comments · Fixed by JabRef/jabref#10592
Closed

Integrate check-bib-for-predatory #348

koppor opened this issue Oct 1, 2019 · 7 comments · Fixed by JabRef/jabref#10592
Assignees

Comments

@koppor
Copy link
Owner

koppor commented Oct 1, 2019

@milescajus
Copy link

Hi, just to let you know in case you weren't notified, the draft PR for this issue is now ready for review :) thanks!

@xuanan20020
Copy link

Hi, koppor, I hope you are doing well. I have noticed that milescajus is no longer interested in this issue. May I take over as an assignee. Thank you :D!

@koppor
Copy link
Owner Author

koppor commented Oct 23, 2023

@xuanan20020 Sure thing. You now even have a "template" for MV file generation at /src/main/java/org/jabref/cli/JournalListMvGenerator.java#L19, which was introduced at JabRef#10298. With the previous try and that PR, you should have a good start!

@reox
Copy link

reox commented Dec 28, 2023

I saw this feature in 5.12 and tested it. However, I fear there are many false positives. For example, if the Publisher is "Springer", "Wiley", "IEEE", "CRC Press" or "Nature Publishing Group", the article/book gets flagged. Sure, you can have some opinions about these publishers but I hope that these are still credible :D
It is also funny that it shows "Science" or "Bone" as predatory journals - which I hope are not...

It would certainly help to show some reasoning behind the flagging, i.e., "shows up in List xyz"

@fofusa
Copy link

fofusa commented Jan 9, 2024

Hello,
My experience is the same than reox.
I just tried this feature on my own database and there are way too many false positives including Nature, Science or journal of the OSA (Optical Society of America) like Optics Letters.
These are highly respected journals that most scientists in my field would not consider predatory.
I think there is something wrong with the list used for flagging.

@koppor
Copy link
Owner Author

koppor commented Jan 9, 2024

@reox @fofusa Thank you so much to replying to the original feature wish.

Can you comment on https://discourse.jabref.org/t/double-check-the-bibliography-for-predatory-publishers-and-journals/1738/3 for ideas how to refine the checker?

I think, the thing you experience is that (some) predatory journals re-use the title of existing journals. And JabRef "just" checks the title of the journal and does not do a DOI lookup to find out the publisher etc. See https://github.com/stop-predatory-journals/stop-predatory-journals.github.io/blob/master/_data/journals.csv for the full list of journals.

@Siedlerchr
Copy link
Collaborator

Maybe we also should limit it to full titles as we currently do also similarity check for the title ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
6 participants