Support for proportional vertical pod autoscaling?

[chrissnell]

We have deployments (example: OPA Gatekeeper that have components that don't scale using more replicas, but need vertical autoscaling as the cluster size grows. It would be awesome if CPA could adjust the resources allocated to a container proportionally based on cluster size.

[k8s-triage-robot]

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

• After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

• Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
• Close this issue with /close
• Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

[MrHohn]

@chrissnell It seems like what you are looking for is https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-proportional-vertical-autoscaler?

Ref https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/cluster-administration/cluster-autoscaling/#sizing-a-workload-based-on-cluster-size for a short introduciton.

[k8s-triage-robot]

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

• After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
• After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

• Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
• Close this issue with /close
• Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten