-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document List of Organizations #1407
Comments
cc: @kubernetes/steering-committee |
For DevStats, we do the following. For data starting from 2015-01-01 it is: If we're missing some, we'll correct. |
kubernetes-ui, kubernetes-up-and-running, kubernetes-digitalocean-terraform, and kubernetes-contrib are not ours. |
There are also orgs for repos/subprojects I believe to be part of kubernetes that don't have "kubernetes-" in their name, eg: |
For reference, Helm started out in the helm org. This is prior to the existence of the CNCF. Once helm became popular it was invited to merge with deployment manager in a new helm v2 that lived in the Kubernetes org. Sometimes after that the CNCF was founded and Kubernetes became a CNCF project. The helm org comes from the history of helm. As far as I know, everything in the helm org aside from helm-www is obselete. helm-www is used to generate the helm.sh website. |
@spiffxp I have not idea who owns https://github.com/kops org ... @justinsb any idea? |
On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 5:49 PM, Aaron Crickenberger < ***@***.***> wrote:
I've been using #1527
<#1527> to try and cover
all repos that are part of this project. Thus far I have opened PR's for
all repos in:
- kubernetes <https://github.com/kubernetes>
- kubernetes-client <https://github.com/kubernetes-client>
- kubernetes-helm <https://github.com/kubernetes-helm>
- kubernetes-incubator <https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator>
Based on discussion above and some educated guesses from this github user
search
<https://github.com/search?p=3&q=kubernetes-&type=Users&utf8=%E2%9C%93>
it seems like I'm missing:
- kubernetes-csi <https://github.com/kubernetes-csi>
Not ours, AFAIK. The one public member is not a storage SIG lead.
- kubernetes-graveyard <https://github.com/kubernetes-graveyard>
- kubernetes-retired <https://github.com/kubernetes-retired>
- kubernetes-ui <https://github.com/kubernetes-ui>
kubernetes-ui isn't really ours, either.
There are also a number of kubernetes-foo orgs that have no (public) repos
or members, but I suspect we preemptively created, or are holding for
future use. Including, but not limited to:
How did you find these OOC?
- kubernetes-addons <https://github.com/kubernetes-addons>
Yes, squatting.
- kubernetes-approvers <https://github.com/kubernetes-approvers>
- kubernetes-apps <https://github.com/kubernetes-apps>
- kubernetes-brigade <https://github.com/kubernetes-brigade>
Don't know about these 3.
- kubernetes-charts <https://github.com/kubernetes-charts>
Yes, squatting.
- kubernetes-community <https://github.com/kubernetes-community>
- kubernetes-contributors <https://github.com/kubernetes-contributors>
- kubernetes-controllers <https://github.com/kubernetes-controllers>
- kubernetes-demos <https://github.com/kubernetes-demos>
- kubernetes-developers <https://github.com/kubernetes-developers>
- kubernetes-ecosystem <https://github.com/kubernetes-ecosystem>
- kubernetes-examples <https://github.com/kubernetes-examples>
Don't know about any of the above.
- kubernetes-extensions <https://github.com/kubernetes-extensions>
- kubernetes-federation <https://github.com/kubernetes-federation>
- kubernetes-incubator-retired
<https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator-retired>
Yes, squatting on these 3.
- kubernetes-ingress <https://github.com/kubernetes-ingress>
- kubernetes-internals <https://github.com/kubernetes-internals>
- kubernetes-maintainers <https://github.com/kubernetes-maintainers>
- kubernetes-owners <https://github.com/kubernetes-owners>
- kubernetes-playground <https://github.com/kubernetes-playground>
Don't know about these.
- kubernetes-providers <https://github.com/kubernetes-providers>
Squatting.
- kubernetes-reviewers <https://github.com/kubernetes-reviewers>
Don't know about this one.
- kubernetes-security <https://github.com/kubernetes-security>
Private.
- kubernetes-sidecars <https://github.com/kubernetes-sidecars>
Squatting.
- kubernetes-testing <https://github.com/kubernetes-testing>
- kubernetes-utils <https://github.com/kubernetes-utils>
Don't know.
- kubernetes-tools <https://github.com/kubernetes-tools>
Squatting.
- kubernetes-universe <https://github.com/kubernetes-universe>
And let's not forget kubernetes-tacos
<https://github.com/kubernetes-tacos>
Don't know.
Also squatting on:
kubernetes-test
—
… You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1407 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHXi0blIOjb6Gp7tbNIdE8tdcWZAFWA9ks5tGYsmgaJpZM4QfmlX>
.
|
/assign |
@mattfarina @spiffxp @bgrant0607 FYI, I'm working on collecting all the GitHub organizations, that include the word "kubernetes" in their naming (to proceed with the further actions). To reconfirm, all the orgs below are the "official" Kubernetes ones, right?
cc @kubernetes/steering-committee @dankohn |
This returns 645 users: https://github.com/search?utf8=✓&q=kubernetes&type=Users But please take a look, it also searches for users tags, name, description etc. I think this is the real list of orgs having "kubernetes" in their name.
Results are here (sorted by the number of events on a given org desc): It returns 49 orgs:
|
Lukasz, thank you for pointing out.
…On Tue, Jan 9, 2018, 9:38 PM Łukasz Gryglicki ***@***.***> wrote:
This returns 645 users:
https://github.com/search?utf8=✓&q=kubernetes&type=Users
And this returns 105:
https://github.com/search?utf8=✓&q=kubernetes-&type=Users
But please take a look, it also searches for users tags, name, description
etc.
So returned list contains all users (mean users or orgs) that has
"kubernetes" anywhere in their profile.
This is not the orgs list
Attached screenshots:
[image: screen shot 2018-01-09 at 20 36 24]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2469783/34739545-e81a36ac-f57c-11e7-96db-4b88d2281b33.png>
[image: screen shot 2018-01-09 at 20 36 27]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2469783/34739546-e8361e12-f57c-11e7-85db-cefcef78e9e3.png>
I think this is the real list of orgs having kubernetes in their name.
Google BigQuery, analyses from 2014-01-01:
select
org.login as org,
count(1) as cnt
from
[githubarchive:month.201801],
[githubarchive:year.2017],
[githubarchive:year.2016],
[githubarchive:year.2015],
[githubarchive:year.2014]
where
LOWER(org.login) like '%kubernetes%'
group by
org
order by
cnt desc,
org
;
Results are here (sorted by the number of events on a given org desc):
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DU0qSu3_DgWjWteEwGHF2MHKS-XmSyvuIpjQKP3BTA8/edit?usp=sharing
It returns 49 orgs.
—
You are receiving this because you were assigned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1407 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAHOuze9sA6yq_GR8gLLiigNI2oarV0wks5tI8BNgaJpZM4QfmlX>
.
|
I've heard no disagreement that these orgs are considered part of the project: I am relatively confident this should be considered part of the project. eg: this repo bills itself as part of the the Kubernetes implementation of CSI and has commits from a member of @kubernetes/sig-storage-* These orgs are part of the project, intended for code that is no longer maintained (goal is to replace "graveyard" with "retired") Based on feedback from Brian, this is a private org that is part of the project: Based on feedback from Brian, we are squatting on these orgs:
I recently created orgs corresponding to ours sigs, so we are squatting on:
|
@lukaszgryglicki any idea why some organizations (eg. |
|
Based on the spreadsheet by @lukaszgryglicki, I've create a spreadsheet to track the "kubernetes" orgs on GitHub - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MQwsWGuQvJc_RepCFgQ9HleQD2m3-_2k8utGcPaVHKY/edit#gid=289132963 @spiffxp - can you please review and update if needed? |
should I update DevStats config (https://github.com/cncf/devstats/blob/master/projects.yaml#L6) when this is approved, confirmed and made official, right? |
I discussed this during sig-architecture meeting this morning. I would like to have sign off from @bgrant0607 on whether we have captured the list of orgs that are part of the project today, and I need help from @thockin to further collect the list of orgs we are squatting on today. |
I've shared the spreadsheet above with the @kubernetes/steering-committee. @spiffxp @thockin @bgrant0607 can you update it if you have any extra data? |
@lukaszgryglicki yes, please. |
@spiffxp Do you agree the spreadsheet is what I should update and sign off on? |
The list here: #1407 (comment) kubernetes-incubator-retired and kubernetes-graveyard should be folded into kubernetes-retired |
I'll update the PR based on that list. |
I am squatting on a lot, but it's not obvious to me how to get a list... |
you should see icons for all your orgs under Organizations on the lower left. Hover over the icons |
@thockin @bgrant0607 They're also listed on https://github.com/settings/organizations for the logged in user, and on the |
I would like to see us PR in the list of orgs we're squatting on with instructions to contact steering@kubernetes.io, instead of using a spreadsheet as the source of truth |
We shouldn't have community documentation in a spreadsheet as folks can't search for it. +1 for a PR with that direction from @spiffxp |
@spiffxp I can submit a PR. Where is the best place for it? |
PTAL #1754 |
@mattfarina is it effectively fixed by #1923? |
I think this can be considered closed now. Any additional changes can happen separately from this issue. /close |
I was attempting to look for a list of the GitHub organizations that are part of Kubernetes and couldn't find any form list. This caught my attention because of CLA checking and formalities. From the Prow configuration I captured:
There are other organizations that exist including, but not limited to:
And... possibly others.
Are there any others aside from the top 3 that are part of the Kubernetes project?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: