Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Batch job admission and flexible resource allocation #269

Closed
davidopp opened this issue Apr 25, 2017 · 11 comments
Closed

Batch job admission and flexible resource allocation #269

davidopp opened this issue Apr 25, 2017 · 11 comments
Assignees
Labels
lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status

Comments

@davidopp
Copy link
Member

davidopp commented Apr 25, 2017

Feature Description

  • One-line feature description (can be used as a release note): Batch job admission and flexible resource allocation
  • Primary contact (assignee): @k82cn, @foxish
  • Responsible SIGs: @kubernetes/sig-scheduling-feature-requests @kubernetes/sig-apps-feature-requests
  • Design proposal link (community repo): high-level architecture doc (currently under review/discussion/iteration) here; detailed design doc to be forthcoming once there is iteration and agreement on the high level design
  • Reviewer(s) - (for LGTM) recommend having 2+ reviewers (at least one from code-area OWNERS file) agreed to review. Reviewers from multiple companies preferred: @davidopp, @erictune, @foxish, @k82cn, @timothysc
  • Approver (likely from SIG/area to which feature belongs): @davidopp, @erictune, @timothysc
  • Initial target stage (alpha/beta/stable) and release (x.y): unclear what, if anything, will be finished in time for 1.7, but it would be alpha in any event

ref/ kubernetes/kubernetes#36716

Note: This feature is intimately related to #268.

@davidopp davidopp added sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. labels Apr 25, 2017
@davidopp davidopp added this to the v1.7 milestone Apr 25, 2017
@davidopp
Copy link
Member Author

I put the 1.7 label on this but realistically we will just be working on it during 1.7 (starting with getting consensus on the design) and it's unclear what from this, if anything, will actually ship in 1.7.

@k82cn
Copy link
Member

k82cn commented Apr 29, 2017

/assign @k82cn, @foxish

@idvoretskyi idvoretskyi added the stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status label May 3, 2017
@davidopp davidopp modified the milestones: next-milestone, v1.7 May 11, 2017
@davidopp
Copy link
Member Author

davidopp commented May 11, 2017

I'm going to move this to next-milestone since we don't anticipate having any code for it in Kubernetes 1.7. (But @k82cn is working in his own repo on it.)

@doprdele
Copy link

Any chance this will make it into 1.8? Also I can't see the design document. Was it removed from gdocs?

@k82cn
Copy link
Member

k82cn commented Aug 29, 2017

@doprdele , we have an incubator project for this feature at https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/kube-arbitrator . It's built out of core.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

Prevent issues from auto-closing with an /lifecycle frozen comment.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or @fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 3, 2018
@foxish
Copy link

foxish commented Jan 24, 2018

/lifecycle frozen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. label Jan 24, 2018
@nehagup
Copy link

nehagup commented Mar 3, 2018

I would like to take up this project as a part of Gsoc'18. Are there any pre-requisites?

@k82cn
Copy link
Member

k82cn commented Mar 4, 2018

@nehagup , I think you need to submit application (refer to https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/how-it-works for more detail). If any more question, please poke me at slack :)

@VineethReddy02
Copy link

Hello!!!
I would like to work in batch scheduling for GSOC this year. I am familiar with golang and docker. How can i begin with this project and where can i find resources regarding this project ??

@k82cn
Copy link
Member

k82cn commented Apr 6, 2018

As we incubated this feature in https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/kube-arbitrator , and we will upgrade it feature by feature. so I'm going to close this one :)

@k82cn k82cn closed this as completed Apr 6, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants