Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Dynamic Kubelet Configuration #281

Closed
27 tasks done
mtaufen opened this issue Apr 26, 2017 · 125 comments
Closed
27 tasks done

Dynamic Kubelet Configuration #281

mtaufen opened this issue Apr 26, 2017 · 125 comments
Assignees
@mtaufen @SergeyKanzhelev
Labels
kind/deprecation Categorizes issue or PR as related to a feature/enhancement marked for deprecation. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node.
Milestone
v1.26

Comments

@mtaufen
Copy link
Contributor

mtaufen commented Apr 26, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Dynamic Kubelet Configuration
@mtaufen mtaufen added the sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. label Apr 26, 2017
@mtaufen mtaufen added this to the v1.7 milestone Apr 26, 2017
@mtaufen mtaufen self-assigned this Apr 26, 2017
@idvoretskyi idvoretskyi added the stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status label May 3, 2017
@mtaufen mtaufen mentioned this issue May 8, 2017
Merged
@mtaufen
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtaufen commented May 23, 2017

Alpha PR: kubernetes/kubernetes#46254

This was referenced May 30, 2017
Closed
Merged
@dchen1107 dchen1107 modified the milestones: next-milestone, v1.7 Jun 14, 2017
@dchen1107
Copy link
Member

Punt this to v1.8.

@jamiehannaford jamiehannaford mentioned this issue Jun 16, 2017
Closed
@calebamiles calebamiles modified the milestones: 1.8, next-milestone Jul 25, 2017
k8s-github-robot pushed a commit to kubernetes/kubernetes that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2017
Merge pull request #46254 from mtaufen/dkcfg
458cc04 
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50016, 49583, 49930, 46254, 50337)

Alpha Dynamic Kubelet Configuration

Feature: kubernetes/enhancements#281

This proposal contains the alpha implementation of the Dynamic Kubelet Configuration feature proposed in ~#29459~ [community/contributors/design-proposals/dynamic-kubelet-configuration.md](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/dynamic-kubelet-configuration.md). 

Please note:
- ~The proposal doc is not yet up to date with this implementation, there are some subtle differences and some more significant ones. I will update the proposal doc to match by tomorrow afternoon.~
- ~This obviously needs more tests. I plan to write several O(soon). Since it's alpha and feature-gated, I'm decoupling this review from the review of the tests.~ I've beefed up the unit tests, though there is still plenty of testing to be done.
- ~I'm temporarily holding off on updating the generated docs, api specs, etc, for the sake of my reviewers 😄~ these files now live in a separate commit; the first commit is the one to review.

/cc @dchen1107 @vishh @bgrant0607 @thockin @derekwaynecarr 

```release-note
Adds (alpha feature) the ability to dynamically configure Kubelets by enabling the DynamicKubeletConfig feature gate, posting a ConfigMap to the API server, and setting the spec.configSource field on Node objects. See the proposal at https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/dynamic-kubelet-configuration.md for details.
```
@mtaufen mtaufen added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Aug 31, 2017
@luxas
Copy link
Member

luxas commented Sep 12, 2017

@mtaufen Any user/admin-facing docs ready for this feature?

@mtaufen
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtaufen commented Sep 12, 2017

No, I really need to write something to teach people how to play with the alpha. What's the preferred place for these docs again?

@luxas
Copy link
Member

luxas commented Sep 13, 2017

@mtaufen https://kubernetes.io/docs (https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes.github.io)
I'll definitely read what it came to look like finally

@mtaufen mtaufen mentioned this issue Sep 18, 2017
Merged
@mtaufen
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtaufen commented Sep 18, 2017

@luxas kubernetes/website#5523

@idvoretskyi
Copy link
Member

@mtaufen can you update the features tracking board with the relevant data?

Thanks.

@idvoretskyi idvoretskyi added the help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. label Sep 19, 2017
@mtaufen
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtaufen commented Sep 19, 2017

Done

@idvoretskyi idvoretskyi removed the help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. label Sep 20, 2017
@mtaufen mtaufen mentioned this issue Sep 26, 2017
Closed
@pipejakob
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like the proposal has moved to:

https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/node/dynamic-kubelet-configuration.md

@mtaufen Want to update the link in the description?

@mtaufen
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtaufen commented Sep 27, 2017

Done, thanks!

@luxas luxas added the stage/beta Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Beta status label Oct 12, 2017
@sftim
Copy link
Contributor

sftim commented Oct 8, 2022

https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/2cd758cc6ab617a93f578b40e97728261ab886ed/keps/sig-node/281-dynamic-kubelet-configuration states that the removal from the API server happens in Kubernetes v1.26

That makes me think we should reopen and track this.
/reopen

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sftim: Reopened this issue.

In response to this:

https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/2cd758cc6ab617a93f578b40e97728261ab886ed/keps/sig-node/281-dynamic-kubelet-configuration states that the removal from the API server happens in Kubernetes v1.26

That makes me think we should reopen and track this.
/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot reopened this Oct 8, 2022
@pacoxu
Copy link
Member

pacoxu commented Oct 9, 2022

https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/2cd758cc6ab617a93f578b40e97728261ab886ed/keps/sig-node/281-dynamic-kubelet-configuration states that the removal from the API server happens in Kubernetes v1.26

kubernetes/kubernetes#112643 is WIP for it.

@SergeyKanzhelev
Copy link
Member

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Oct 10, 2022
@SergeyKanzhelev SergeyKanzhelev mentioned this issue Oct 10, 2022
Merged
@rhockenbury
Copy link

See kubernetes/kubernetes#112643 (comment) for the approved exception request for v1.26.

@leonardpahlke
Copy link
Member

/label lead-opted-in
/label tracked/yes
/milestone v1.26

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot modified the milestones: v1.24, v1.26 Oct 10, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@leonardpahlke: Can not set label lead-opted-in: Must be member in one of these teams: [release-team-enhancements sig-api-machinery-leads sig-apps-leads sig-architecture-leads sig-auth-leads sig-autoscaling-leads sig-cli-leads sig-cloud-provider-leads sig-cluster-lifecycle-leads sig-contributor-experience-leads sig-docs-leads sig-instrumentation-leads sig-k8s-infra-leads sig-multicluster-leads sig-network-leads sig-node-leads sig-release-leads sig-scalability-leads sig-scheduling-leads sig-security-leads sig-storage-leads sig-testing-leads sig-windows-leads]

In response to this:

/label lead-opted-in
/label tracked/yes
/milestone v1.26

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team label Oct 10, 2022
@gracenng
Copy link
Member

let me see if i have perm haha
/label lead-opted-in

@gracenng gracenng added the lead-opted-in Denotes that an issue has been opted in to a release label Oct 10, 2022
@leonardpahlke
Copy link
Member

:D whatt, I guess we can add release-team-leads to the list

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@gracenng: Can not set label lead-opted-in: Must be member in one of these teams: [release-team-enhancements sig-api-machinery-leads sig-apps-leads sig-architecture-leads sig-auth-leads sig-autoscaling-leads sig-cli-leads sig-cloud-provider-leads sig-cluster-lifecycle-leads sig-contributor-experience-leads sig-docs-leads sig-instrumentation-leads sig-k8s-infra-leads sig-multicluster-leads sig-network-leads sig-node-leads sig-release-leads sig-scalability-leads sig-scheduling-leads sig-security-leads sig-storage-leads sig-testing-leads sig-windows-leads]

In response to this:

let me see if i have perm haha
/label lead-opted-in

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@leonardpahlke leonardpahlke mentioned this issue Oct 10, 2022
Merged
@rhockenbury rhockenbury moved this to Deprecation in 1.26 Enhancements Tracking Oct 11, 2022
@rhockenbury
Copy link

Hi @mtaufen and @SergeyKanzhelev 👋,

Checking in as we approach 1.26 code freeze at 17:00 PDT on Tuesday 8th November 2022.

Please ensure the following items are completed:

  • All PRs to the Kubernetes repo that are related to your enhancement are linked in the above issue description (for tracking purposes).

For the deprecation, please let me know if we should tracking any PRs beyond #3605. I have this marked as tracked.

As always, we are here to help should questions come up. Thanks!

@krol3
Copy link

krol3 commented Nov 7, 2022

Hello @mtaufen 👋, 1.26 Release Docs Lead here. This enhancement is marked as ‘Needs Docs’ for 1.26 release.

Please follow the steps detailed in the documentation to open a PR against dev-1.26 branch in the k/website repo. This PR can be just a placeholder at this time, and must be created by November 9. Also, take a look at Documenting for a release to familiarize yourself with the docs requirement for the release.

Any doubt, reach us! Thank you!

@mtaufen
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtaufen commented Nov 10, 2022

Closing this issue since this feature has been on the deprecation track for a while. kubernetes/kubernetes#102966

@mtaufen mtaufen closed this as completed Nov 10, 2022
@mtaufen
Copy link
Contributor Author

mtaufen commented Nov 10, 2022

@SergeyKanzhelev FYI

@leonardpahlke leonardpahlke mentioned this issue Nov 30, 2022
Merged
@marosset marosset removed lead-opted-in Denotes that an issue has been opted in to a release tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team labels Dec 14, 2022
@SergeyKanzhelev SergeyKanzhelev mentioned this issue Aug 5, 2024
Merged
25 tasks
@nightkr nightkr mentioned this issue Nov 26, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mtaufen mtaufen

@SergeyKanzhelev SergeyKanzhelev

Labels
kind/deprecation Categorizes issue or PR as related to a feature/enhancement marked for deprecation. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node.
Projects
1.26 Enhancements Tracking
Status: Deprecation
Milestone
v1.26
Development

No branches or pull requests