Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Name GCP resources better #397

Closed
ashi009 opened this issue Jul 13, 2018 · 6 comments
Closed

Feature Request: Name GCP resources better #397

ashi009 opened this issue Jul 13, 2018 · 6 comments
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.

Comments

@ashi009
Copy link

ashi009 commented Jul 13, 2018

It's annoying to see a backend being referred as k8s-be-31073--d4ff5a71b6e25bd6, or an instance group being named as k8s-ig--d4ff5a71b6e25bd6. All these names are totally meaningless on the GKE console.

Is it possible to give them some more meaningful names?

@nicksardo nicksardo added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Jul 16, 2018
@mayansalama
Copy link

Piggybacking onto this, it would be useful if there were a way to configure the name of the backend-service created by the Ingress.

I've been looking into using IAP for authentication, however getting user ID in GKE requires the backend service ID, which is a bit of a chicken and egg problem. Right now getting it working properly requires either redeploying, dynamic config, or looking up the service ID live - being able to name the backend service ID would make this somewhat easier.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 13, 2018
@rramkumar1
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle frozen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Nov 30, 2018
@rramkumar1
Copy link
Contributor

@skmatti CC'ing you since you are looking into this.

@shpml
Copy link

shpml commented Apr 28, 2021

Is there any progress on this? Trying to view metrics and create alerts based on response codes with a backend being referred as above isn't very informative. Ideally I'd like to see the k8's service name.

@swetharepakula
Copy link
Member

Closing as this issue hasn't had any comments in over a year. The newer GCP resources like NEGs do have service names added into the name.

@swetharepakula swetharepakula closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jun 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants