-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 303
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature Request: Name GCP resources better #397
Comments
Piggybacking onto this, it would be useful if there were a way to configure the name of the backend-service created by the Ingress. I've been looking into using IAP for authentication, however getting user ID in GKE requires the backend service ID, which is a bit of a chicken and egg problem. Right now getting it working properly requires either redeploying, dynamic config, or looking up the service ID live - being able to name the backend service ID would make this somewhat easier. |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
@skmatti CC'ing you since you are looking into this. |
Is there any progress on this? Trying to view metrics and create alerts based on response codes with a backend being referred as above isn't very informative. Ideally I'd like to see the k8's service name. |
Closing as this issue hasn't had any comments in over a year. The newer GCP resources like NEGs do have service names added into the name. |
It's annoying to see a backend being referred as
k8s-be-31073--d4ff5a71b6e25bd6
, or an instance group being named ask8s-ig--d4ff5a71b6e25bd6
. All these names are totally meaningless on the GKE console.Is it possible to give them some more meaningful names?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: