Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add missing paths #528

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 17, 2023
Merged

add missing paths #528

merged 5 commits into from
Oct 17, 2023

Conversation

YiscahLevySilas1
Copy link
Collaborator

@YiscahLevySilas1 YiscahLevySilas1 commented Oct 16, 2023

PR Type:

Enhancement


PR Description:

This pull request enhances the existing checks for image pull policies in Kubernetes configurations. Specifically, it adds missing 'reviewPaths' to the alert messages generated when a container has the 'latest' tag on its image but the imagePullPolicy is not set to 'Always'. This addition will provide more context and clarity for users reviewing these alerts.


PR Main Files Walkthrough:

files:

rules/image-pull-policy-is-not-set-to-always/raw.rego: The 'reviewPaths' field has been added to the alert messages in three checks: for pods, workloads, and cronjobs. This field contains the paths to the relevant container's image and imagePullPolicy in the Kubernetes configuration.


User Description:

Overview

Signed-off-by: YiscahLevySilas1 <yiscahls@armosec.io>
@codiumai-pr-agent-free codiumai-pr-agent-free bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 16, 2023
@codiumai-pr-agent-free
Copy link
Contributor

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Enhancement of alert messages in Kubernetes configurations checks
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR enhances the existing checks for image pull policies in Kubernetes configurations. It adds missing 'reviewPaths' to the alert messages generated when a container has the 'latest' tag on its image but the imagePullPolicy is not set to 'Always'. This addition provides more context and clarity for users reviewing these alerts.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 2, because the changes are straightforward and only involve adding a new field to the alert messages.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No

PR Feedback

  • 💡 General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and the changes are clear. However, it would be beneficial to include tests that verify the new 'reviewPaths' field in the alert messages.

  • 🤖 Code feedback:

    • relevant file: rules/image-pull-policy-is-not-set-to-always/raw.rego
      suggestion: Consider adding a validation to ensure that the 'reviewPaths' field is not empty before adding it to the alert message. This can help avoid potential issues where the field is present but does not contain any useful information. [medium]
      relevant line: "reviewPaths": paths,

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

Signed-off-by: YiscahLevySilas1 <yiscahls@armosec.io>
Signed-off-by: YiscahLevySilas1 <yiscahls@armosec.io>
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

YiscahLevySilas1 and others added 2 commits October 17, 2023 09:44
Signed-off-by: YiscahLevySilas1 <yiscahls@armosec.io>
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

@YiscahLevySilas1 YiscahLevySilas1 merged commit 387d1c3 into master Oct 17, 2023
28 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants