You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There also seems to be a 30 * 90 * 100ms (4.5mins) timeout regardless of pairing.
Could we block the reset when a call is made to start partial flashing or fetching MY_DATA, to avoid the reset triggering in the middle?
The new UI flow in the mobile apps may take the user through pairing on the way to flashing or fetching MY_DATA, and we would like to avoid asking the user to reset to Bluetooth mode again before continuing to flash or fetch. The partial flashing protocol includes a call to reset, but using it adds a delay to the process.
I guess I can set a flag variable to block the reset easily enough, but I can't remember the original motivation for the timeouts.
We have a workaround for this in the app, but it's bad Ux (we make the user reset again after pairing). I'd like to fix this, and it would also need a fix in CODAL. It seems pretty straightforward unless we've missed some important reason to do it @finneyj.
After Bluetooth pairing shows a tick. there is a reset after a 15 second timeout,
https://github.com/lancaster-university/codal-microbit-v2/blob/master/source/bluetooth/MicroBitBLEManager.cpp#L895
https://github.com/lancaster-university/microbit-dal/blob/master/source/bluetooth/MicroBitBLEManager.cpp#L744
There also seems to be a 30 * 90 * 100ms (4.5mins) timeout regardless of pairing.
Could we block the reset when a call is made to start partial flashing or fetching MY_DATA, to avoid the reset triggering in the middle?
The new UI flow in the mobile apps may take the user through pairing on the way to flashing or fetching MY_DATA, and we would like to avoid asking the user to reset to Bluetooth mode again before continuing to flash or fetch. The partial flashing protocol includes a call to reset, but using it adds a delay to the process.
I guess I can set a flag variable to block the reset easily enough, but I can't remember the original motivation for the timeouts.
Am I forgetting something @finneyj ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: