You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since the dependencies for Bifrost have remained constant for a while, it seems like it would be more efficient to have a Dockerfile containing just the dependencies (maybe mirrored in another branch so you can pull from docker hub with docker pull ledatelescope/bifrost:deps).
The main Dockerfile would then just have to contain FROM ledatelescope/bifrost:deps, which would make it shorter, and would also mean that local builds would happen faster (you could just pull the dependencies and go). This would make the travis-ci tests faster too, as travis wouldn't have to keep re-building the entire dependency stack.
Docker hub has auto-building functionality on each commit, so we would still see the most up-to-date binaries being pulled.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Since the dependencies for Bifrost have remained constant for a while, it seems like it would be more efficient to have a Dockerfile containing just the dependencies (maybe mirrored in another branch so you can pull from docker hub with
docker pull ledatelescope/bifrost:deps
).The main Dockerfile would then just have to contain
FROM ledatelescope/bifrost:deps
, which would make it shorter, and would also mean that local builds would happen faster (you could just pull the dependencies and go). This would make the travis-ci tests faster too, as travis wouldn't have to keep re-building the entire dependency stack.Docker hub has auto-building functionality on each commit, so we would still see the most up-to-date binaries being pulled.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: