We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hey Heng,
I have an example that leads to a segfault. We are running into many of those lately...even using HEAD.
minimap2 ref.fasta read.fasta -a -k 15 -w 5 -H [M::mm_idx_gen::0.001*3.95] collected minimizers [M::mm_idx_gen::0.002*2.96] sorted minimizers @SQ SN:ref LN:2316 @PG ID:minimap2 PN:minimap2 VN:2.14-r883 CL:minimap2 -a -k 15 -w 5 -H ref.fasta read.fasta [M::main::0.002*2.89] loaded/built the index for 1 target sequence(s) [M::mm_mapopt_update::0.002*2.77] mid_occ = 5 [M::mm_idx_stat] kmer size: 15; skip: 5; is_hpc: 1; #seq: 1 [M::mm_idx_stat::0.002*2.70] distinct minimizers: 507 (99.21% are singletons); average occurrences: 1.014; average spacing: 4.506 [1] 52247 segmentation fault minimap2 ref.fasta read.fasta -a -k 15 -w 5 -H
I get to align.c:672
-> 672 mm_seq_rev(rs - rs0, tseq); (lldb) print rs (int32_t) $13 = 75 (lldb) print rs0 (int32_t) $14 = 78
leading to an underflow.
Thank you, Armin
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
cf2bae6
Thanks. That is an oversight. -H creates quite a lot of corner cases.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Much appreciated. Any chance to get a 2.15 cut soon, since the last one has been two months ago?
I am running routine tests. If the results are ok, I will cut a release today or tomorrow.
No branches or pull requests
Hey Heng,
I have an example that leads to a segfault. We are running into many of those lately...even using HEAD.
I get to align.c:672
leading to an underflow.
Thank you,
Armin
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: