You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, thanks for the great work! (I am using libigl in a daily basis)
In the cpp implementation the boundary_loop function has two overloads:
One returns all of the loops, the other only returns the largest loop.
It seems in the python-binding only the latter overload has a python API.
I wonder if it is possible to also expose the first overload to python?
Currently, I have to use igl.boundary_facets first and use scipy's sparse graph utilities to do the same thing.
If the libigl python binding can support this, it would be much more convenient, thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, thanks for the great work! (I am using libigl in a daily basis)
In the cpp implementation the
boundary_loop
function has two overloads:One returns all of the loops, the other only returns the largest loop.
It seems in the python-binding only the latter overload has a python API.
I wonder if it is possible to also expose the first overload to python?
Currently, I have to use
igl.boundary_facets
first and use scipy's sparse graph utilities to do the same thing.If the libigl python binding can support this, it would be much more convenient, thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: