You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
XKOS provides xkos:ConceptAssociation to support n:m correspondences.
In the case of a 1:m or n:1 relation, it is unclear whether these would be partitive or subsumptive relations.
It would be helpful for 1:m (and n:1) associations to also be able to carry a predicate to clarify this.
XKOS provides xkos:specializes and xkos:isPartOf to clarify the hierarchical relationship skos:broader.
However, this applies within a classification, and not as part of matching relationships between classifications.
Perhaps xkos:specializesMatch and xkos:isPartOfMatch are also needed?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
To be studied for V2.
This would be specializations of skos:broaderMatch or skos:narrowerMatch ?
See what Records In Contexts (RiC-O 1.0) is doing in terms of equiavlence between relation entities and their equivalent binary predicate. See looong dicussion at ICA-EGAD/RiC-O#67
XKOS provides
xkos:ConceptAssociation
to support n:m correspondences.In the case of a 1:m or n:1 relation, it is unclear whether these would be partitive or subsumptive relations.
It would be helpful for 1:m (and n:1) associations to also be able to carry a predicate to clarify this.
XKOS provides
xkos:specializes
andxkos:isPartOf
to clarify the hierarchical relationshipskos:broader
.However, this applies within a classification, and not as part of matching relationships between classifications.
Perhaps
xkos:specializesMatch
andxkos:isPartOfMatch
are also needed?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: