Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relationship (complementarity?) of XKOS with work on STW-Thesaurus, SKOS-history #79

Open
laurentlefort opened this issue Feb 15, 2017 · 1 comment
Milestone

Comments

@laurentlefort
Copy link

Again, a remark prompted by an earlier comment from Antoine Isaac in #26

Are you aware of the progress made by Joachim Neubert since 2013 on his approach to manage the changes of Thesaurus over time (see references below)?

Could this be a "simple way" to recommend how to document while waiting for a fully tested and more complete solution adapted to the need of our community?

References: Joachim Neubert: work on STW-Thesaurus, SKOS-history

SKOS-History:
https://github.com/jneubert/skos-history/wiki/Resources
https://github.com/jneubert/skos-history/blob/master/skos-history.ttl

STW-Thesaurus: http://zbw.eu/stw/version/latest/about
(2013) Constantly under construction STW-Thesaurus for Economics Linked Data Maintenance http://dcevents.dublincore.org/IntConf/dc-2013/paper/view/152/168 (slides) DC-2013
(2014) KOS Evolution in Linked data http://swib.org/swib14/slides/neubert_swib14_16.pdf (slides) SWIB 2014
(2015) Leveraging SKOS to Trace the Overhaul of the STW Thesaurus for Economics http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/download/3774/1964 DC-2015

SKOS/Issues/ConceptEvolution https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/SKOS/Issues/ConceptEvolution (created at the time of the Linked Library Data Incubator Group: LLD XG)

@tfrancart
Copy link
Contributor

Analysis on a potential use/alignement of SKOS history can be made in v2

@tfrancart tfrancart added this to the Version 2 milestone Apr 20, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants