You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now, the two types of rules are distinct and have their own grammar and infrastructure.
However, we should think about ways that we can combine them.
Arithmetic rules can sometimes be more expressive.
For example, what if we could use an aggregation (like mean) in a logical rule.
If x's friends are happy, x is happy as well:
1 / |y| * Friends(x, +y) & Happy(y) -> Happy(x)
Or using a blocking predicate in an arithmetic rule:
Block(x, b) & Block(y, b) & Something(x, y) <= 1.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Issue by eriq-augustine
Thursday Apr 25, 2019 at 17:47 GMT
Originally opened as eriq-augustine#207
Right now, the two types of rules are distinct and have their own grammar and infrastructure.
However, we should think about ways that we can combine them.
Arithmetic rules can sometimes be more expressive.
For example, what if we could use an aggregation (like mean) in a logical rule.
If
x
's friends are happy,x
is happy as well:Or using a blocking predicate in an arithmetic rule:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: