Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Instead of storing patches inside the script, allow the user to supply patches themself #10

Open
averms opened this issue Oct 21, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@averms
Copy link

averms commented Oct 21, 2020

I can't be the only one who thinks storing a patch inside a string is not ideal. On top of that, the script is not up-to-date with all the patches from https://www.lua.org/bugs.html. Plus, I might want to apply one of the Lua Power Patches. Overall, I think the cleaner solution is to deprecate the --patch option for something like --apply {names}

@Erutuon
Copy link

Erutuon commented Jun 27, 2021

I don't know about removing the patches currently stored, but it would be nice to be able to apply the Advanced Readline Patch, particularly to LuaJIT or Moonjit, because the REPL is a pain to use without the arrow keys working properly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants