Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Performance improvement - magepack bundle to utilize multiple cores #113

Open
kanevbg opened this issue Aug 6, 2021 · 9 comments
Open

Comments

@kanevbg
Copy link

kanevbg commented Aug 6, 2021

In one of my projects it takes 5 minutes to bundle the static content (magepack bundle).
1 theme with 17 locales.

@kanevbg
Copy link
Author

kanevbg commented Aug 20, 2021

If anyone has any ideas for the implementation please share.

@Quazz
Copy link

Quazz commented Sep 2, 2021

Not sure about multiple cores, but I'm assuming the slowest part is accessing the webpages and waiting for everything to load so it can extract the appropriate javascript. So running those tasks in parallel/async would see the biggest performance improvement, but not sure how to go about implementing that reliably.

And of course, the faster your website is, the faster it will finish collecting

@kanevbg
Copy link
Author

kanevbg commented Oct 13, 2021

@Quazz magepack bundle is not doing any requests, its working with already generated static content, or I am wrong?

@Quazz
Copy link

Quazz commented Oct 14, 2021

@kanevbg No, you're right; it's magepack generate that does the requests.

@kanevbg
Copy link
Author

kanevbg commented Oct 14, 2021

@drabikowy do you know if this will be picked up for implementation from creativestyle, can you forward it to someone for consideration?

@kanevbg
Copy link
Author

kanevbg commented Dec 18, 2021

Please someone from creativestyle/magesuite share tough for implementation before I go ahead and code it for a PR.

@kanevbg
Copy link
Author

kanevbg commented Jan 20, 2022

One word please?

@kanevbg
Copy link
Author

kanevbg commented Oct 25, 2022

Up

1 similar comment
@kanevbg
Copy link
Author

kanevbg commented Jan 25, 2023

Up

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants