-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 321
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
High resolution image #3
Comments
with waifu2x? (x |
We described our attempts of generating high-resolution images in the paper. In our situation, the limitation of the resolution mainly comes from the training dataset. We also try to train our own SRGAN based super-resolution models, but not able to find a satisfying model yet. Therefore we leave the exploration of super-resolution models for future work. |
@Aixile I might be able to help if you need a high res training set. |
edit: anyway I agree too with high res option but it would need to be trained using a high res dataset and after that I suggest adding an option on what type of expression, or -dere expression(e.g yandere, tsundere, kuudere), etc. |
I am tried from this command to proceed new high-res images.
@Aixile Yes, you are right. |
@Aixile The paper says:
Did you also scale up small images to 128x128 or just use images larger than 128x128? From figure 14, it appears that more than half of the 42000 faces are smaller than 128x128, so if there were 31255 training images, it suggests that the small images were also used. Did this have any negative effects? |
@shaform I used images larger than 80*80 in the original 42000 faces. Personally, I think 1.5x upsampling is still affordable. |
@Aixile Thanks! BTW, do you think it's possible to just extract faces from episodes of animes? Maybe we could get high volume of high resolution, high quality faces in this way. |
@shaform Yes, but one fundamental problem for building large and high-quality anime face dataset is that lbpcascade_animeface, the only anime face detection library available online, uses old-fashioned methods and has a poor precision/recall... We are still improving our method and the dataset. Currently, we have achieved a much better result on CelebA dataset compared to the model we published. Hopefully to release the new model several months later. |
The website can produce 256x256 images now, which might close this issue. |
Please be able to export images with high resolution.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: