You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Support combined query with SPARQL by adding functionality to the graphs.sparql() method.
Use the existing "documentQuery" parameter to pass in the qtext, structured query, and options information in the combined query form.
The SPARQL part of the query would still be passed in via the "query" parameter on the graphs.sparql() method (not as a "sparql" property in the combined query).
The Node.js queries end up as a combination queries under the hood eventually. So sending things in that way via "documentQuery" should involve a pass-through of sorts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@ayuwono, it turns out this wasn't a feature to implement since if you put a combined query into the 'docQuery' parameter of graphs#sparql(), the combined query is handled correctly.
I added some tests for using combined query in test-basic, see caa8b4a. I didn't see any such tests in test-complete. You should probably add some there if they aren't there already.
Note that this is related to #437, a documentation bug.
Support combined query with SPARQL by adding functionality to the graphs.sparql() method.
Use the existing "documentQuery" parameter to pass in the qtext, structured query, and options information in the combined query form.
The SPARQL part of the query would still be passed in via the "query" parameter on the graphs.sparql() method (not as a "sparql" property in the combined query).
The Node.js queries end up as a combination queries under the hood eventually. So sending things in that way via "documentQuery" should involve a pass-through of sorts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: