Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Question]: should I expect to see SonarQube build for Bitbucket integrations #893

Closed
dbaggott opened this issue Mar 29, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #998
Closed

[Question]: should I expect to see SonarQube build for Bitbucket integrations #893

dbaggott opened this issue Mar 29, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #998
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@dbaggott
Copy link

Describe the bug

First and foremost, thank you for this valuable plugin. Your work and contribution to the community is much appreciated!

I am not sure if this is a bug or expected behavior, so this is really a question as to what I should expect with regards to functionality when switching from the the Developer Edition to using the Community Edition Version 9.9.4 and version 1.14.0 of this lovely plugin.

We use Bitbucket for source control and, after making the transition from Developer to Community+plugin, the SonarQube builds that we were previously seeing in Bitbucket disappeared. Fortunately, the code comments and the report are still present so the basic integration is working fine.

So, my question is: is there a way to get the SonarQube build back within Bitbucket or is that not supported with this plugin?

The screenshots below illustrate what I'm referring to if it's not clear.

Bitbucket Integration with Developer Edition Screenshot

Note the presence of a SonarQube build that is either green or red depending on the results (green in this case):

Zight 2024-03-29 at 12 04 50 PM

Bitbucket Integration with Community Edition + Plugin Screenshot

Note the absence of a SonarQube build:

Zight 2024-03-29 at 12 05 41 PM

Software Versions

  • SonarQube Version: Community Edition Version 9.9.4 (build 87374)
  • Plugin Version: 1.14.0

Thank you!

@dbaggott dbaggott added the bug Something isn't working label Mar 29, 2024
@mc1arke mc1arke added question Further information is requested and removed bug Something isn't working labels Aug 11, 2024
mc1arke added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 16, 2024
The Bitbucket decorators submit a report to Bitbucket containing the
quality gate summary, but don't submit a report that influences the
build status. A second call is being made to submit abuild status that
is either successful is the Quality Gate has passed, or failed is the
Quality Gate did not pass.
mc1arke added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 16, 2024
The Bitbucket decorators submit a report to Bitbucket containing the
quality gate summary, but don't submit a report that influences the
build status. A second call is being made to submit abuild status that
is either successful is the Quality Gate has passed, or failed is the
Quality Gate did not pass.
@mc1arke mc1arke linked a pull request Nov 16, 2024 that will close this issue
mc1arke added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 17, 2024
The Bitbucket decorators submit a report to Bitbucket containing the
quality gate summary, but don't submit a report that influences the
build status. A second call is being made to submit abuild status that
is either successful is the Quality Gate has passed, or failed is the
Quality Gate did not pass.
mc1arke added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 17, 2024
The Bitbucket decorators submit a report to Bitbucket containing the
quality gate summary, but don't submit a report that influences the
build status. A second call is being made to submit abuild status that
is either successful is the Quality Gate has passed, or failed is the
Quality Gate did not pass.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants