We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently, attributes are not able to be part of a union, since unions of primitive types are not allowed in GraphQL schemas.
Firstly, we should investigate whether unions of literals and non-literals are actually common enough in RDF datasets to warrant solving this issue.
If so, then we should come up with a way to represent these unions in the GraphQL schema.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Currently, attributes are not able to be part of a union, since unions of primitive types are not allowed in GraphQL schemas.
Firstly, we should investigate whether unions of literals and non-literals are actually common enough in RDF datasets to warrant solving this issue.
If so, then we should come up with a way to represent these unions in the GraphQL schema.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: