Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integer Fundamental Type Precisions #147

Open
DarkArc opened this issue Feb 28, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Integer Fundamental Type Precisions #147

DarkArc opened this issue Feb 28, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@DarkArc
Copy link

DarkArc commented Feb 28, 2024

I'm curious why the IFC specifies default, short, and long, but not long long for fundamental type precision?

The IFC writes out:

  • long long = int w/ 64-bit precision
  • long = int w/ long precision
  • int = int w/ default precision

This seems like an odd discrepancy (some builtin types represented via bitwidth and some are represented via a label)?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant