Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluate Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) and LLVM BOLT #752

Closed
zamazan4ik opened this issue Sep 25, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Evaluate Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) and LLVM BOLT #752

zamazan4ik opened this issue Sep 25, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request needs triage

Comments

@zamazan4ik
Copy link

Hi!

Recently I did many Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) benchmarks on multiple projects (including static analysis tools and compilers like Rustc, Clang, Clangd, Clang Tidy, and many others) - the results are available here. So that's why I think it's worth trying to apply PGO to Qsharp.

I can suggest the following things to do:

  • Evaluate PGO's applicability to Qsharp.
  • If PGO helps to achieve better performance - add a note to Qsharp's documentation about that. In this case, users and maintainers will be aware of another optimization opportunity for Qsharp.
  • Provide PGO integration into the build scripts. It can help users and maintainers easily apply PGO for their own workloads.
  • Optimize prebuilt binaries with PGO.

Here are some examples of how PGO is already integrated into other projects' build scripts:

After PGO, I can suggest evaluating LLVM BOLT as an additional optimization step after PGO.

For the Rust projects, I recommend starting with cargo-pgo.

@zamazan4ik zamazan4ik added enhancement New feature or request needs triage labels Sep 25, 2023
@swernli
Copy link
Collaborator

swernli commented Oct 20, 2023

This does not seem to be relevant to our ongoing work.

@swernli swernli closed this as completed Oct 20, 2023
@zamazan4ik
Copy link
Author

This does not seem to be relevant to our ongoing work.

@swernli Could you please describe a little bit more, why it's not important? I guess the compiler performance could be interesting for the Qsharp users.

Even if the compiler performance isn't the current dev team focus, I still suggest leaving the issue open. So maybe someone from the community will decide to help with the issue and will make a PR with enabling PGO for Qsharp.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request needs triage
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants