Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multiple tabs in the same view #8318

Closed
DoctorSclero opened this issue Nov 18, 2020 · 10 comments
Closed

Multiple tabs in the same view #8318

DoctorSclero opened this issue Nov 18, 2020 · 10 comments
Labels
Issue-Feature Complex enough to require an in depth planning process and actual budgeted, scheduled work. Needs-Attention The core contributors need to come back around and look at this ASAP. Needs-Tag-Fix Doesn't match tag requirements Needs-Triage It's a new issue that the core contributor team needs to triage at the next triage meeting

Comments

@DoctorSclero
Copy link

Description of the new feature/enhancement

I'd like to have the possibility to have two terminals in the same window like visual studio code with 2 files, witch one is opened on the side. To increase productivity by visualizing multiple consoles in the same place

@DoctorSclero DoctorSclero added the Issue-Feature Complex enough to require an in depth planning process and actual budgeted, scheduled work. label Nov 18, 2020
@ghost ghost added Needs-Tag-Fix Doesn't match tag requirements Needs-Triage It's a new issue that the core contributor team needs to triage at the next triage meeting labels Nov 18, 2020
@zadjii-msft
Copy link
Member

Do you mean something like panes? (see also #1000)

@zadjii-msft zadjii-msft added the Needs-Author-Feedback The original author of the issue/PR needs to come back and respond to something label Nov 18, 2020
@DoctorSclero
Copy link
Author

DoctorSclero commented Nov 18, 2020

Yes, finally I found it.
I would suggest making that function more visible, the way I found it was in the Settings file in a comment in the last lines.
image

@ghost ghost added Needs-Attention The core contributors need to come back around and look at this ASAP. and removed Needs-Author-Feedback The original author of the issue/PR needs to come back and respond to something labels Nov 18, 2020
@DHowett
Copy link
Member

DHowett commented Nov 19, 2020

Thanks for pointing this out!

We have surfaced it in a couple places:

Is there another more obvious place that we could put it? 😄

@DHowett DHowett added Needs-Author-Feedback The original author of the issue/PR needs to come back and respond to something and removed Needs-Attention The core contributors need to come back around and look at this ASAP. labels Nov 19, 2020
@Don-Vito
Copy link
Contributor

Don-Vito commented Nov 19, 2020

@DHowett - I am using the panes since day one with shortcuts, and it was today that I learnt about the Alt+Click capability (probably since I never leave a full screen mode on a 3rd monitor).

However, sincerely speaking, the feature is quite hidden:

  • Tooltips are hidden (who is patient enough to wait for them)
  • Command palette is hidden itself

This is how my search for Tooltip Practices looks like:
image

I am not sure how much screen estate can be sacrificed for this, but probably the feature is vital enough to allocate some.
For instance we could:

  • Educate, e.g., add a label to the top of the menu rather than a tooltip
  • Provide more interactive ways to invoke the functionality, e.g.,
    • a dedicated button (like in vscode)
    • some additional menu organization.
    • add split pane to a tab context menu

@zadjii-msft
Copy link
Member

add split pane to a tab context menu

That's my favorite of all these solutions IMO. I don't want to clutter the new tab menu all that much more, especially with something like #1571 being possible. But nested Split Pane... > [Horizontal, Vertical] > [Profiles...] entries seem like they would work well.

(we'd run abreast of #8238, but I think the idea's still good)

@ghost ghost added the No-Recent-Activity This issue/PR is going stale and may be auto-closed without further activity. label Nov 23, 2020
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 23, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been marked as requiring author feedback but has not had any activity for 4 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 3 days of this comment.

@Don-Vito
Copy link
Contributor

@zadjii-msft - can we stop the bot from closing it? 😊

@ghost ghost removed the No-Recent-Activity This issue/PR is going stale and may be auto-closed without further activity. label Nov 23, 2020
@DoctorSclero
Copy link
Author

@zadjii-msft I think it could be something like visual studio code that you can drag the window around the screen to split the current screen or open new windows with the already opened tabs. I don't know if this is already proposed, it can be more intuitive to the people that are approaching this stuff for the first time.

@ghost ghost added Needs-Attention The core contributors need to come back around and look at this ASAP. and removed Needs-Author-Feedback The original author of the issue/PR needs to come back and respond to something labels Nov 23, 2020
@zadjii-msft
Copy link
Member

Okay, yea what you're looking for is already covered in #4587, #7075, and a little bit of #4998. Since this is pretty well covered by other threads, @DoctorSclero is it okay if we close this one as a duplicate?

@DoctorSclero
Copy link
Author

DoctorSclero commented Nov 23, 2020

@zadjii-msft Yes, of course, it's ok😀 , by the way, I think this is the best terminal you all invented, a very good job. Congrats

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Issue-Feature Complex enough to require an in depth planning process and actual budgeted, scheduled work. Needs-Attention The core contributors need to come back around and look at this ASAP. Needs-Tag-Fix Doesn't match tag requirements Needs-Triage It's a new issue that the core contributor team needs to triage at the next triage meeting
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants