-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 335
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Server is sending diagnostics without a character field #1393
Comments
@ram02z can you please provide me with the example code where this is happending since the npm ESLint module should have never generated this and I would like to forward the issue to the ESLint team. |
And I actually sanitize missing values to zero here: vscode-eslint/server/src/eslintServer.ts Line 600 in 7568b4c
So I would really like to understand why this is happening. |
@dbaeumer sure. Here is the file: https://gist.github.com/ram02z/e85910e6b8aa1044637607c5c950f595 Here are the neovim lsp logs that have a missing column: https://gist.github.com/ram02z/b11a3bbd53211d0199a13b32ad1e7a81 |
@ram02z thanks for the file. But it is not enough to reproduce this. It looks like it depends on some configuration files / plugins / eslint version. Can you provide me with a GitHub repository I can clone that demos this? |
@dbaeumer You were right about the error depending on configuration/plugins. Seems like the eslint-plugin-jsdoc plugin was causing the issue when the file was opened with the following {
"parserOptions": {
"ecmaVersion": 12,
"sourceType": "module"
},
"plugins": ["jsdoc"],
"rules": {
"jsdoc/valid-types": 1
}
} The ESLint version is 8.6.0 |
Thanks, was able to reproduce. The problem is that the jsdoc extension sets the values to |
I'd like to preface that I am using the server packaged in https://github.com/hrsh7th/vscode-langservers-extracted. However, I thought this might still be an issue since the Neovim development team has said that LSPs should specify a column in their diagnostics.
Reference:
neovim/neovim#16673 (comment)
neovim/neovim#16675
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: