Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ordering and naming tasks #89448

Closed
sandy081 opened this issue Jan 28, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Ordering and naming tasks #89448

sandy081 opened this issue Jan 28, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
bug Issue identified by VS Code Team member as probable bug insiders-released Patch has been released in VS Code Insiders polish Cleanup and polish issue tasks Task system issues verified Verification succeeded
Milestone

Comments

@sandy081
Copy link
Member

Testing #89343

Currently tasks are shown as below when running command Tasks: Configure Task in alphabetical order

image

I think following order is better and consistent

  • User Tasks
  • Workspace Tasks
  • Tasks for each Workspace Folder

Also user tasks have User Settings as description. It is nothing to do with Settings. So probably calling it just User is good enough

@alexr00
Copy link
Member

alexr00 commented Nov 12, 2021

The task list is filterable, and your recent tasks always show at the top anyway which means that the grouping by source could be confusing. Sticking with the alphabetical ordering, but changing "User settings" to "User".

@alexr00 alexr00 modified the milestones: On Deck, November 2021 Nov 12, 2021
@rzhao271 rzhao271 added the verified Verification succeeded label Dec 3, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 27, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug Issue identified by VS Code Team member as probable bug insiders-released Patch has been released in VS Code Insiders polish Cleanup and polish issue tasks Task system issues verified Verification succeeded
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants
@rzhao271 @sandy081 @alexr00 and others