OS minimum version numbers are unreliable

[timsneath]

I'd love to be able to trust the value of SupportedOSPlatform, but currently the data appears dangerously (!) inaccurate. This is super-hard, I know, but it would be better to not have it in the metadata than have unreliable data.

Some examples:

Function	Documented minVer	Metadata minVer
winsock functions	Windows Vista	8.1
ClosePseudoConsole and other modern console functions	17763	none
GetDisplayAutoRotationPreferences	Windows 8.0	none
GetMachineTypeAttributes	22000	none
GetTempPath2	20348	none
IsWow64Process2	10586	16299

[riverar]

Yeah most of the values are wrong. You should completely ignore this attribute until a major overhaul is completed.

[riverar]

Will close this for #738. If you believe that's in error, just holler!

[timsneath]

I think we should either document that it's unreliable, or (preferably) remove the field from the database until it has some modicum of accuracy.

(FWIW, I wasted an afternoon implementing this in my Dart projection instead of my artisanally handcrafted values before I realized that it was a retrograde step.)

[riverar]

Agreed, and sorry! ☹️