Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 11, 2019. It is now read-only.

RFC: Package/Binary naimng #63

Open
ignatenkobrain opened this issue Dec 4, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

RFC: Package/Binary naimng #63

ignatenkobrain opened this issue Dec 4, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@ignatenkobrain
Copy link
Contributor

Since I'm packaging this for Fedora I would like to get opinion on naming.. Since parallel name is taken by GNU parallel, I am thinking how to name package and whether to rename binary.

  • rust-parallel
  • parallel-rust
  • parallel-rs

Thoughts?

@Flat
Copy link
Contributor

Flat commented Dec 4, 2017

I think it would likely depend on the naming policies for packages on Fedora. I currently maintain the aur package[1] for Arch Linux and have decided on going with the parallel-rust package name. I do not rename the binary and have the package conflict with GNU Parallel as it is mostly a drop in replacement.

  1. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/parallel-rust/

@mmstick
Copy link
Owner

mmstick commented Dec 4, 2017

I think parallel-rust / parallel-rs are fine.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants