Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Coverage option that does not require cbmc-viewer #2610

Closed
adpaco-aws opened this issue Jul 19, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #2609
Closed

Coverage option that does not require cbmc-viewer #2610

adpaco-aws opened this issue Jul 19, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #2609
Assignees
Labels
[C] Feature / Enhancement A new feature request or enhancement to an existing feature. T-RFC Label RFC PRs and Issues

Comments

@adpaco-aws
Copy link
Contributor

Requested feature: In the past, Kani has relied on cbmc-viewer to generate coverage reports. This requires Kani to make additional calls to cbmc with the --cover flag, then cbmc-viewer to essentially perform postprocessing on that output. Unfortunately, the information reported by cbmc-viewer isn't tested thoroughly (see #2048). But actually, Kani already has the tools required for generating coverage-oriented information. Having an option that enables this would allow us to remove the cbmc-viewer dependency and have end-to-end testing for coverage information.

Use case: Coverage reports.
Link to relevant documentation (Rust reference, Nomicon, RFC): N/A

@adpaco-aws adpaco-aws added the [C] Feature / Enhancement A new feature request or enhancement to an existing feature. label Jul 19, 2023
@adpaco-aws adpaco-aws self-assigned this Jul 19, 2023
@jaisnan
Copy link
Contributor

jaisnan commented Jul 20, 2023

Should we tag our PR for this issue?

This was referenced Jul 20, 2023
@celinval celinval added the T-RFC Label RFC PRs and Issues label Jul 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[C] Feature / Enhancement A new feature request or enhancement to an existing feature. T-RFC Label RFC PRs and Issues
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants