You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think some of the column names in the graph metrics tables (generated by linker.compute_graph_metrics()) could benefit from a renaming to make them more descriptive and to align with documentation on metrics.
For example, the n_nodes column in the cluster metrics table (i.e. the count of nodes in a cluster) is referred to as 'cluster size' in the documentation. Renaming the column to 'cluster_size' would be more consistent. Likewise, it may be a good idea to update the names of the density and centralisation columns to cluster_density and `cluster_centralisation respectively to make it clear that these metrics are quantifying characters of clusters (rather than, say, edges).
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your proposal related to a problem?
Describe the solution you'd like
I think some of the column names in the graph metrics tables (generated by
linker.compute_graph_metrics()
) could benefit from a renaming to make them more descriptive and to align with documentation on metrics.For example, the
n_nodes
column in the cluster metrics table (i.e. the count of nodes in a cluster) is referred to as 'cluster size' in the documentation. Renaming the column to 'cluster_size' would be more consistent. Likewise, it may be a good idea to update the names of thedensity
andcentralisation
columns tocluster_density
and `cluster_centralisation respectively to make it clear that these metrics are quantifying characters of clusters (rather than, say, edges).Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: