Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Plans to upgrade to Lit 3 and Material Web 1 (M3)? #221

Open
hartmannj opened this issue Dec 12, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Plans to upgrade to Lit 3 and Material Web 1 (M3)? #221

hartmannj opened this issue Dec 12, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
@motss
Labels
6.x Rewrite with Lit 3, Material Design 3, and vitest + Playwright breaking-change dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file enhancement in-progress on roadmap

Comments

@hartmannj
Copy link

Are there any plans to upgrade this library to Lit 3 and material-web 1, now that it has a stable release?
@motss
Copy link
Owner

motss commented Dec 12, 2023

Thank you, @hartmannj. I’m currently upgrading to Lit 3, but it’s a long process. I didn’t know that MD3 for web had launched its v1 version. I’ll definitely try it out after I’m done with the Lit 3 upgrade.

@hartmannj
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your hard work, this library definitely fills a gap. Material Web does not look like having a datepicker anytime soon at all.

@motss motss added enhancement in-progress breaking-change on roadmap dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file 6.x Rewrite with Lit 3, Material Design 3, and vitest + Playwright labels Jan 18, 2024
@motss motss self-assigned this Jan 18, 2024
@motss motss mentioned this issue Jan 18, 2024
Open
10 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@motss motss

Labels
6.x Rewrite with Lit 3, Material Design 3, and vitest + Playwright breaking-change dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file enhancement in-progress on roadmap
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@hartmannj @motss