Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluate using Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) and LLVM BOLT #1077

Open
zamazan4ik opened this issue Oct 22, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Evaluate using Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) and LLVM BOLT #1077

zamazan4ik opened this issue Oct 22, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@zamazan4ik
Copy link

zamazan4ik commented Oct 22, 2023

Hi!

Recently I checked Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) improvements on multiple projects. The results are here. E.g. PGO results for LLVM-related tooling are here. According to the tests, PGO usually helps with the compiler and compiler-like workloads (like static analysis) - e.g. Clang gets +20% compilation speed with PGO. That's why I think trying to optimize the Rust-Code-Analysis tool with PGO can be a good idea.

I can suggest the following action points:

  • Perform PGO benchmarks on Rust-Code-Analysis. And if it shows improvements - add a note about possible improvements in Rust-Code-Analysis's tool performance with PGO.
  • Providing an easier way (e.g. a build option) to build scripts with PGO can be helpful for the end-users and maintainers since they will be able to optimize the Rust-Code-Analysis tool according to their own workloads.
  • Optimize pre-built binaries

Testing Post-Link Optimization techniques (like LLVM BOLT) would be interesting too (Clang and Rustc already use BOLT as an addition to PGO) but I recommend starting from the usual PGO.

I recommend trying to use PGO with cargo-pgo for the Rust code.

Here are some examples of how PGO optimization is integrated in other projects:

@marco-c marco-c added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 23, 2023
@marco-c
Copy link
Collaborator

marco-c commented Oct 23, 2023

Sounds good to me!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants