Port listing on cable connection

[deku-m]

NetBox version

v3.5.4

Python version

3.10.6

Steps to Reproduce

Steps:

• Use device type C9200L-48P-4X from library for example and create a device named ITA-LN-ASW03-1, ITA-LN-ASW03-2
  See screenshots from ITA-LN-ASW03-1, ITA-LN-ASW03-2 no double stackports under their interfaces
  
  
• create virtual chassis ITA-LN-ASW03
• create members under it (ITA-LN-ASW03-1, ITA-LN-ASW03-2)
• create a stack cable connection from a ITA-LN-ASW03-1 to ITA-LN-ASW03-2 (one member of virtual chassis).
  As seen in screenshot.
• check the interface and select interface. You can see extra stackports which come from the member devices their interfaces i think.
  Which shouldnt be there as they are physical devices.

As you can see the list has double entries when creating i think a virtual switch. but the physical part is still the same you need to know in the list when you have a device member of the virtual chassis and it is member 2. That you need to select the second stackport1/2 in the list (see example about stackport).

The overview of the list makes it unclear which one to select but the entry will change when selecting the wrong Stackport for example and save it. Then the cable connection values change to the selected one.

See below:

Expected Behavior

Some sort of knowhow perhaps so that the list is not unclear or only the interfaces that are from the physical device itself.
Not a mix with the other members.
As it looks like it is using the virtual chassis instead of physical device and interfaces itself.

Observed Behavior

[jsenecal]

Thank you for opening a bug report. Unfortunately, the information you have provided is not sufficient for someone else to attempt to reproduce the reported behavior. Remember, each bug report must include detailed steps that someone else can follow on a clean, empty NetBox installation to reproduce the exact problem you're experiencing. These instructions should include the creation of any involved objects, any configuration changes, and complete accounting of the actions being taken. Also be sure that your report does not reference data on the public NetBox demo, as that is subject to change at any time by an outside party and cannot be relied upon for bug reports.

[deku-m]

I extended the method i used that showed me the "bug"

[DanSheps]

This is captured under #11478 however I would like to point out, your second chassis ports should be 2/1 and 2/2 not 1/1 and 1/2, likewise your third switch stack ports should be 3/1 and 3/2.

[DanSheps]

Duplicate of #11478