Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

dump() without alphabetical order #1106

Closed
berte opened this issue May 24, 2018 · 2 comments · Fixed by #2258
Closed

dump() without alphabetical order #1106

berte opened this issue May 24, 2018 · 2 comments · Fixed by #2258
Assignees
@nlohmann
Labels
kind: question release item: ✨ new feature solution: duplicate the issue is a duplicate; refer to the linked issue instead solution: proposed fix a fix for the issue has been proposed and waits for confirmation
Milestone
Release 3.9.0

Comments

@berte
Copy link

berte commented May 24, 2018

Hi,

is it possible to use dump without alphabetical order?

cheers,
@nlohmann
Copy link
Owner

No, see the last note here: https://github.com/nlohmann/json#notes

@nlohmann nlohmann added kind: question solution: duplicate the issue is a duplicate; refer to the linked issue instead labels May 24, 2018
@nlohmann nlohmann added release item: ✨ new feature solution: proposed fix a fix for the issue has been proposed and waits for confirmation labels Jul 11, 2020
@nlohmann nlohmann self-assigned this Jul 11, 2020
@nlohmann nlohmann added this to the Release 3.8.1 milestone Jul 11, 2020
@nlohmann nlohmann reopened this Jul 11, 2020
@nlohmann
Copy link
Owner

To be fixed with #2258.

@nlohmann nlohmann mentioned this issue Jul 11, 2020
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@nlohmann nlohmann

Labels
kind: question release item: ✨ new feature solution: duplicate the issue is a duplicate; refer to the linked issue instead solution: proposed fix a fix for the issue has been proposed and waits for confirmation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Release 3.9.0
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Add ordered_json specialization with ordered object keys nlohmann/json
2 participants
@nlohmann @berte