Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Node.js Foundation Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Meeting 2016-03-03 #57

Closed
rvagg opened this issue Mar 3, 2016 · 15 comments
Closed

Comments

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented Mar 3, 2016

Time

UTC Thu 03-Mar-2016 20:00:

  • San Francisco: Thu 03-Mar-2016 12:00
  • New York: Thu 03-Mar-2016 15:00
  • Amsterdam: Thu 03-Mar-2016 21:00
  • Moscow: Thu 03-Mar-2016 23:00
  • Sydney: Fri 04-Mar-2016 07:00
  • Tokyo: Fri 04-Mar-2016 05:00

Or in your local time:

Links

Agenda

Extracted from tsc-agenda labelled issues and pull requests from the nodejs org prior to the meeting.

nodejs/TSC

nil

We will likely be discussing foundational Foundation things, see some of recent open pull requests on this repo for that theme.

Invited

Notes

The agenda comes from issues labelled with tsc-agenda across all of the repositories in the nodejs org. Please label any additional issues that should be on the agenda before the meeting starts.

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Mar 3, 2016

@mikeal just pinged and indicated that one of our recently elected Foundation Board representatives @feross has some questions for the TSC as he's working to get his head around various aspects of the Foundation. As we have a light agenda today, I'd like to invite him to join today's call.

@rvagg
Copy link
Member Author

rvagg commented Mar 3, 2016

fine by me

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

As per nodejs/inclusivity#78 the Inclusivity WG has both @hg and @nebrius interested in joining. I suggest we add them both as observers for a week or two to get a better feel for who might want to be the rep long-term and then have the WG finalize it.

cc @nodejs/tsc ^^

Edit: It's @hg not @jona, sorry Dx

@mikeal
Copy link
Contributor

mikeal commented Mar 3, 2016

@Fishrock123 It's not a great precedent for the TSC to pick and choose the rep from WGs or projects. I don't see a huge problem with adding people as observers for a while but I would recommend kicking the final decision for which one of them is given voting privileges to the Inclusivity WG.

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

@mikeal Yes, agreed, I don't think I implied anything else but it's possible that I did. I.e. we shouldn't vote on which, this is for them to be more informed.

@nebrius
Copy link
Contributor

nebrius commented Mar 3, 2016

Yes, my understanding is that the WG will decide. @hg and I are interested in observing to get a better feel for the process, and help the group come to a consensus on who we want to nominate (we'd like to avoid needing to do a vote, if possible).

@mikeal
Copy link
Contributor

mikeal commented Mar 3, 2016

My bad, i missread the comment :)

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

UPDATE: We are going to use Uberconference instead. Participants should have the link.

@rvagg
Copy link
Member Author

rvagg commented Mar 3, 2016

This is what I'm going to propose as a starting point for discussion about mission of the Foundation. I'd like us to back up from the dirty detail about process, questions for applications, structure and all of that and make sure we get alignment between the board and the TSC on what we are trying to achieve together. Then everything else should be able to flow from there and we can argue on the basis of a shared position and our understanding of how that works.

Node.js Foundation Mission

The Node.js Foundation exists to increase the adoption of Node.js.

This goal is achieved by:

* Maintaining the health of the core Node.js project.
* Fostering and encouraging a healthy Node.js open source ecosystem.
* Fostering and encouraging a healthy commercial ecosystem of training, products and services for Node.js.

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

Partial recording on youtube at https://youtu.be/-vf23GsR6vk

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

Livestream viewers:

(Capped out at about 8 or 9 again I think)

node_livestream_viewers-2016-03-03

@williamkapke
Copy link
Contributor

Any chance there can be more lead time on these meetings? Maybe watching this repo for issues isn't the best way to get informed?

...I would have loved to contribute to that "watching now" number ;)

@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member

@williamkapke They're weekly, same time slot every Thursday.

@williamkapke
Copy link
Contributor

Awesome- thank you. Where is this posted? I'm sure it is- but somehow I didn't find it. Probably something really obvious too!

@mikeal
Copy link
Contributor

mikeal commented Mar 9, 2016

I've removed the tsc-agenda tags from pending applications while we are on pause from considering new ones.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants